TL;DR
- Insider incidents cost financial institutions $20 million per year on average. Banking institutions need monitoring that works without new GLBA exposure.
- Input-based surveillance fails. Tracking keystrokes invites $10 USB jigglers. Outcome-focused productivity analysis is smarter.
- Screenshot tools capture NPI from banker screens. That pulls your employee monitoring software into the GLBA Safeguards Rule scope.
- The right choice depends on your staff mix. Tellers, corporate teams, and remote bankers each need different capabilities.
Presented by WorkTime, a GLBA-safe monitoring solution that delivers secure, non-invasive productivity insights for financial institutions.
The compliance & risk problem for banking institutions
Financial institutions sit at the sharp end of insider risk. The 2025 Ponemon Cost of Insider Risks Report puts the annualized cost of insider incidents in the banking sector at $20 million. That's the highest of any industry. Verizon's 2025 DBIR found that financial services has overtaken healthcare as the most breached industry, accounting for 27% of major breaches. Data breaches tied to insiders drive roughly 45% of incidents across industries. FFIEC guidance requires layered security, including activity monitoring, and the FTC's updated GLBA Safeguards Rule mandates access controls and oversight of systems touching non-public personal information. Then came Wells Fargo. In May 2024, the bank fired more than a dozen wealth management staff over allegations of keyboard-simulation devices faking work hours. The lesson: if your monitoring software only watches inputs, a $10 device defeats it. A 2024 Forbes Advisor survey found 39% of workers say employer monitoring damages the relationship with their company. Heavy-handed surveillance erodes trust and employee engagement fast.What to require in banking monitoring software
Here's what to require before buying any employee monitoring solution for a regulated banking team.- GLBA-safe data handling. The monitoring software must not ingest customer NPI. Tools that capture screenshots, window titles with account numbers, or clipboard content complicate efforts to ensure compliance. Prefer metric-only tools.
- On-premise or private cloud. Many banks cannot send workforce data to the shared cloud.
- Audit trail depth. Your monitoring dashboard should produce timestamped logs and exportable productivity insights that assist management in spotting gaps.
- Attendance and overtime visibility. Overtime fraud is a known issue. Look for attendance monitoring that surfaces false claims.
- Shared workstation support. Teller terminals rotate across shifts, and the same holds for call centers. Activity tracking must handle multi-user devices without creating workflow inefficiencies.
- AES-256 encryption and SOC 2. Table stakes for any banking monitoring software.
- Remote coverage. Finance is the second-highest remote work adoption industry per BLS Q1 2026 data. Your tool must cover remote teams with the same rigor as branch staff.
How we ranked these tools
We assessed each best employee monitoring software candidate against banking criteria: GLBA posture, NPI safety, deployment, audit logging, fraud detection, scalability, and cost. Each tool earns a category win based on where it fits best.Top 6 employee activity monitoring software for banks
1. WorkTime: Best for GLBA-safe, non-invasive monitoring
Best for: Banks that need productivity tracking, attendance, and insider threat visibility without capturing customer NPI from banker screens. WorkTime is built on metric-only data. It never captures screenshots, keystroke content, email text, clipboard contents, or screen recordings. It captures numerical data only: productivity scores per banking team, active and idle time, software usage, and online meeting time. Because WorkTime never touches customer NPI, it sits outside the GLBA Safeguards Rule's Service Provider requirements.

Access 80+ reports for detailed performance analytics. WorkTime ensures transparency and supports GLBA-safe monitoring by avoiding the capture of sensitive financial information.
Start free trial- GLBA-safe mode with configurable data minimization
- Attendance monitoring and late-login alerts
- Overtime reporting that surfaces employee fraud
- Remote vs. in-office comparison for hybrid bankers
- Burnout detection for high-pressure banking roles
- On-premise, cloud, and private cloud deployment
- AES-256 encryption.
2. Teramind: Best for data loss prevention and forensics
Best for: Large investment banks with mature security teams needing deep DLP and full session recording.
3. ActivTrak: Best for workforce analytics on hybrid bankers
Best for: Regional banks and credit unions needing lighter-touch productivity monitoring for corporate teams.
4. Veriato: Best for AI-driven insider risk detection
Best for: Banks with dedicated insider risk programs wanting AI-assisted anomaly detection with session playback.
5. Hubstaff: Best for field auditors and mobile staff
Best for: Banking institutions with field roles such as commercial loan officers and ATM technicians needing GPS and mobile time tracking.
6. Controlio: Best for shared branch terminals
Best for: Community banks with tellers rotating across shared terminals needing real-time monitoring and session visibility.
At-a-glance comparison
| Tool | Captures screen content | On-premise | GLBA fit | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WorkTime |
![]() |
![]() |
Exempt (no NPI) |
Non-invasive monitoring & in-depth performance analytics |
|
Teramind |
![]() |
![]() |
Compliant (with SPA) |
DLP and insider threat |
|
ActivTrak |
Optional |
![]() |
Compliant |
Hybrid workforce analytics |
|
Veriato |
![]() |
![]() |
Compliant (with SPA) |
AI-driven insider risk |
|
Hubstaff |
Optional |
![]() |
Compliant |
Field staff time tracking |
|
Controlio |
![]() |
![]() |
Compliant (with SPA) |
Shared branch terminals |
GLBA-exempt vs. GLBA-compliant: a critical distinction
Every vendor claims "GLBA compliance." The question that matters: Does the tool ingest NPI or not?- GLBA-exempt tools never capture customer NPI. WorkTime is built this way. Banks don't need a Service Provider Agreement and don't document the vendor during an FFIEC examination.


GLBA-safe mode adds an extra layer of protection by eliminating potential indirect data risks, making monitoring suitable for strict compliance standards.
Start free trial- GLBA-compliant tools handle NPI but claim to do so securely. Screenshot products and keystroke logging platforms fall here. They can be deployed safely with an executed SPA, documented controls, and ongoing oversight.












